From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262957AbVFVIBc (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:01:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262903AbVFVHxN (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 03:53:13 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56982 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262906AbVFVHuX (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 03:50:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:49:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Esben Nielsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-V0.7.49-00 Message-ID: <20050622074937.GE16508@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Esben Nielsen wrote: > Yep, just as I pressed sent before I saw the following: ok, i'll have to look at the latency trace of this. > threshold violated: 28.0% (273usec) btw., are you sure this happened with latency timing/tracing disabled? (the printks will disturb the rtc_wakeup test). Ingo