From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262746AbVFVKGd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:06:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261903AbVFVKFf (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:05:35 -0400 Received: from jurassic.park.msu.ru ([195.208.223.243]:63413 "EHLO jurassic.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262746AbVFVKFH (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:05:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:04:48 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12-mm1 Message-ID: <20050622140448.A32312@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <20050619233029.45dd66b8.akpm@osdl.org> <20050620131451.GA9739@shadowen.org> <20050621225551.GB24289@suse.de> <42B92DFA.7060705@shadowen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <42B92DFA.7060705@shadowen.org>; from apw@shadowen.org on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:23:06AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:23:06AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Ivan, can you shead any light on whether the hunk of your patch above is > one of the three fixes, whether its a fourth fix, and indeed whether its > needed? This is the core part of those four changes (and actually it should have been attributed to Linus). So your patch is absolutely correct, thanks. Ivan.