From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262676AbVFWVND (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:13:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262662AbVFWVMV (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:12:21 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:57992 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261709AbVFWVKp (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:10:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050623.141038.122619255.davem@davemloft.net> To: jesper.juhl@gmail.com, juhl-lkml@dif.dk Cc: loz@holmes.demon.co.uk, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLIP: simplify sl_free_bufs From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jesper Juhl Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:46:06 +0200 (CEST) > The patch below still applies cleanly to 2.6.12 - any chance this might > get applied? or any good reasons not to apply it? I'll put it in my tree, give me a day or so.