From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261932AbVFWAt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261331AbVFWAt0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:49:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.lnxw.com ([207.21.185.24]:29700 "EHLO smtp.lnxw.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261935AbVFWAtE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:49:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:55:38 -0700 To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Ingo Molnar , Bill Huey , Kristian Benoit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 Message-ID: <20050623005538.GA3348@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <1119287612.6863.1.camel@localhost> <20050620183115.GA27028@nietzsche.lynx.com> <42B98B20.7020304@opersys.com> <20050622192927.GA13817@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050622200554.GA16119@elte.hu> <42B9CC98.1040402@opersys.com> <20050622220428.GA28906@elte.hu> <42B9F673.4040100@opersys.com> <20050623000607.GB11486@elte.hu> <42BA069D.20208@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42BA069D.20208@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Bill Huey (hui) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 08:47:25PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > FWIW, Opersys has no engineering cycles to spare. This current > testset and all related human and hardware costs are actually > coming straight out of my personal pocket. I have no client paying > for this. And, FWIW, I had absolutely no idea what we were going > to find when I started this. Certainly I didn't expect that What you found with this is the very limit of your patience :) > preempt_rt would be able to do as good as the ipipe in terms of > interrupt latency, and that's to your credit. ... > After all, showing how much of a fraud we are shouldn't be that > difficult, you're a very competent developer. And because of > that last reason, I have a hard time holding this ad-hominem > attack against you. I am dissapointed though. He's probably confusing you from the real FUDers. I don't see you as a FUDer. He's just resentful fighting with you over attention from the same batch of strippers at last years OLS. :) bill