From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263030AbVFWSnv (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:43:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263035AbVFWSje (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:39:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:22441 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263031AbVFWSgv (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:36:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:32:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, pavel@suse.cz, ak@muc.de, hch@lst.de, Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file Message-Id: <20050623113254.2675ffc6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050623140316.GH3749@stusta.de> References: <20050623142335.A5564@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050623140316.GH3749@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > >... > > However, wouldn't it be a good idea if this file was ordered by "when" ? > > A quick scan of the file reveals a couple of overdue/forgotten items > > (maybe they happened but the entry in the file got missed?): > >... > > What: register_ioctl32_conversion() / unregister_ioctl32_conversion() > > When: April 2005 > >... > > The removal (including the removal of the feature-removal-schedule.txt > entry) is already in -mm. Actually it has been temporarily removed because it has a dependency on update-drm-ioctl-compatibility-to-new-world-order.patch which has a dependency on David's DRM tree and I don't know how to get David's DRM tree any more. Hint.