From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262533AbVF1FIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:08:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262534AbVF1FIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:08:46 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:9915 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262533AbVF1FIo (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:08:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050627.220827.21920197.davem@davemloft.net> To: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <42C0D717.2080100@yahoo.com.au> References: <42C0AAF8.5090700@yahoo.com.au> <20050628040608.GQ3334@holomorphy.com> <42C0D717.2080100@yahoo.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:50:31 +1000 > William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > >On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:42:16AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > >spin_unlock() does not imply a memory barrier. > > > > Intriguing... BTW, I disagree with this assertion. spin_unlock() does imply a memory barrier. All memory operations before the release of the lock must execute before the lock release memory operation is globally visible.