From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261722AbVF0Ova (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:51:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261725AbVF0Osc (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:48:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52665 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262039AbVF0MiX (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:38:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:38:22 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: Andi Kleen , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Jeff Mahoney , penberg@gmail.com, reiser@namesys.com, flx@namesys.com, zam@namesys.com, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] verbose BUG_ON reporting Message-ID: <20050627123821.GE14251@wotan.suse.de> References: <84144f0205062223226d560e41@mail.gmail.com> <42BB0151.3030904@suse.de> <20050623114318.5ae13514.akpm@osdl.org> <20050623193247.GC6814@suse.de> <1119717967.9392.2.camel@localhost> <20050627072449.GF19550@suse.de> <20050627072832.GA14251@wotan.suse.de> <20050627082046.GC14251@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It won't work for me because it'll bloat the kernel .text > > considerable. There is a reason why BUG is implemented > > like it is. Compare it. > > The assertion codes bloat the kernel all the same. So how about this > instead? It's still useless - it is too bloated to turn on by default and then if you need it you still won't have it. And when you explicitely turn it on then you likely don't need it because you control the source. -Andi