From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261604AbVF0U35 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:29:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261656AbVF0U1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:27:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:23434 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261665AbVF0U0Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:26:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:26:47 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jan Kara Cc: sct@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Checkpoint lists split Message-Id: <20050627132647.5c21eeba.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050627142328.GM20512@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20050627142328.GM20512@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan Kara wrote: > > I've noticed that the patch splitting transaction's t_checkpoint_list > into two lists (one for buffers to-be-submitted and one for already > submitted buffers) is not in -mm kernels. Is there any reason why you've > dropped it? If you just missed the version that fixed the bug or some > similar mistake happened then please put the patch into -mm (it's > attached and applies fine against 2.6.12-mm2). It's still sitting in my to-apply folder, so it isn't lost. The first version was a bit traumatic, so I was holding off until I have time to do a bunch of filesystem testing..