From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261256AbVF1T65 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:58:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261240AbVF1T6w (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:58:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:10473 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261256AbVF1T4f (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:56:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:56:33 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Greg KH Cc: Kyle Moffett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ndevfs - a "nano" devfs Message-ID: <20050628195633.GA26131@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050624081808.GA26174@kroah.com> <9EE4350F-5791-4787-950B-14E5C2B9ADB8@mac.com> <20050628074145.GC3577@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050628074145.GC3577@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:41:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:57:55PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote: > > One of the things that most annoys me about udev is that I still need > > a minimal static dev in order for the system to boot. > > Why? You should not. Works just fine for me here :) Er, don't you need /dev/console for console output to happen? (And that it's a good idea to have /dev/null around too). Or has that changed? -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/