From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262338AbVF2Rz4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:55:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262346AbVF2Rzp (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:55:45 -0400 Received: from dsl.dynamic851009584.ttnet.net.tr ([85.100.95.84]:7110 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262338AbVF2RyX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:54:23 -0400 From: Ismail Donmez Organization: Bogazici University To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc1 problems Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:55:01 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 Cc: randy_dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200506291934.32909.ismail@kde.org.tr> <200506292015.11494.ismail@kde.org.tr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506292055.02153.ismail@kde.org.tr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 29 June 2005 20:51, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Ismail Donmez wrote: > >=20 > > Thank you both!.=C2=A0Any idea about this part? : > >=20 > > Jun 29 19:16:32 localhost kernel: Badness in __kfree_skb at=20 > > net/core/skbuff.c:290 > > I've not seen that one. It's _possible_ that it's caused by the > same get_request bug: although that's over in a different subsystem, > it does mess up the preempt_count/hardirq_count enough to be able to > cause such a problem elsewhere. But I see this message came 87 secs > after your others, which makes that unlikely. Do you still see this > __kfree_skb badness after running with the get_request fix? So far its fine. Thank you. ismail -- Animals use pee to mark their territories. Humans use others' girl friends