mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc1
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:00:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050629210028.GO16867@khan.acc.umu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a874849050629123150462099@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 6/29/05, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > Anyway, I really don't want to drag out 2.6.13 as long as 2.6.12 took, and
> > we don't have any reason to anyway, so let's try to see if we can calm
> > things down again, and people who are thinking about writing new code
> > might think about spending some quality time looking at the existing code
> > and patches instead.
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> 
> That sounds like a really good idea. If 2.6.13 could get out the door
> fairly quickly and be the result of everyone saying "let's make this a
> rock solid kernel and shake all the bugs out" that would be great..  A
> sort of 2.6.12 on stabilizers ;)
> I know I'll be doing my bit to fix some of the minor bits.

I don't think the combination of an almost 3MB diff vs 2.6.12 and
a fairly quick release is going to end up being a rock solid kernel. =)

But I hope I'm wrong.


Regards: David
-- 
 /) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander      (\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Full colour fire           (/

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-29 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-29  6:30 Linus Torvalds
2005-06-29  7:46 ` Brice Goglin
2005-06-29  9:02   ` Brice Goglin
2005-06-29  9:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-29 12:13 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc1 - [PATCH] Don't fill up log with atxp1 vcore change message Prakash Punnoor
2005-06-29 15:01 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc1 - bad tag in git tree? Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-29 15:28   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-29 15:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-29 19:31 ` Linux 2.6.13-rc1 Jesper Juhl
2005-06-29 21:00   ` David Weinehall [this message]
2005-06-29 22:34 ` Bill Davidsen
     [not found] <4kEoS-Am-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-29 14:23 ` Ronny V. Vindenes
2005-06-29 14:58   ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-06-29 15:07     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-06-29 15:20       ` Ronny V. Vindenes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050629210028.GO16867@khan.acc.umu.se \
    --to=tao@acc.umu.se \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®