From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262726AbVF2X0w@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262726AbVF2X0w (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:26:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262728AbVF2X0w
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:26:52 -0400
Received: from smtp.lnxw.com ([207.21.185.24]:28171 "EHLO smtp.lnxw.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262726AbVF2X0v (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:26:51 -0400
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:33:53 -0700
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>, Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
       karim@opersys.com, mingo@elte.hu, pmarques@grupopie.com,
       bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de,
       sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org,
       akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3
Message-ID: <20050629233353.GA23953@nietzsche.lynx.com>
References: <42C320C4.9000302@opersys.com> <20050629225734.GA23793@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050629230308.GC6421@g5.random>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050629230308.GC6421@g5.random>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Bill Huey (hui) <bhuey@lnxw.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Why should he compile with CONFIG_SMP when CONFIG_SMP is absolutely
> unnecessary without preempt-RT?

Because I'm the Anti-Ingo and say so.

bill