From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262768AbVF3BBC (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:01:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262769AbVF3BBC (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:01:02 -0400 Received: from agminet04.oracle.com ([141.146.126.231]:17275 "EHLO agminet04.oracle.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262768AbVF3BA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:00:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:57:23 -0700 From: Joel Becker To: Adrian Bunk Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N." Message-ID: <20050630005723.GE23823@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mail-Followup-To: Adrian Bunk , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050624080315.GC26545@stusta.de> <20050629213038.GA23823@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050630004738.GA27478@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050630004738.GA27478@stusta.de> X-Burt-Line: Trees are cool. X-Red-Smith: Ninety feet between bases is perhaps as close as man has ever come to perfection. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:47:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > But I get your point, what about the patch below? Non-descriptive. We are descriptive for sysfs (and even allow the choice!). I'd say that leaving the description but perhaps adding the caveat about modules and unsure-N might be a good way to go. Joel -- "If you are ever in doubt as to whether or not to kiss a pretty girl, give her the benefit of the doubt" -Thomas Carlyle Joel Becker Senior Member of Technical Staff Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127