From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261251AbVGCKlF (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:41:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261255AbVGCKlF (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:41:05 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:2503 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261251AbVGCKlC (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:41:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:30:45 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: arjan@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FUSE merging? Message-ID: <20050630163045.GA1299@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050630022752.079155ef.akpm@osdl.org> <1120125606.3181.32.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > if you are so interested in getting fuse merged... why not merge it > > first with the security stuff removed entirely. And then start > > discussing putting security stuff back in ? > > BTW, I can split out the security stuff into a separate patch from the > rest, if people feel more confortable discussing a concrete patch, > instead of a range of lines (actually a 15 line function) of the > whole. Yes, I think that would help. [And also make it last in the series ;-)] Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.