From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261652AbVGBAGH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:06:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261661AbVGBAGH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:06:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:19890 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261652AbVGBAGB (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:06:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:06:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] UML - skas0 - separate kernel address space on stock hosts Message-Id: <20050701170648.2762c702.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200507020157.37593.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <200507012131.j61LVCLi027276@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20050701145802.5cebabd2.akpm@osdl.org> <200507020157.37593.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jeff Dike wrote: > > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts > > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0. > > > > I note that this patch assumes that > > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied. > > You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct? Well I can fix the reject if we decide that uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but it seems that there's no need. > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, > and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. OK.. Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" sign next to it.