From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262451AbVGGCIQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:08:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262434AbVGGCIN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:08:13 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:57315 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262451AbVGGCIF (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:08:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050706.190758.71090134.davem@davemloft.net> To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: davej@redhat.com, pmarques@grupopie.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Slowdown with randomize_va_space in 2.6.12.2 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050706181220.3978d7f6.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050706.125719.08321870.davem@davemloft.net> <20050706205315.GC27630@redhat.com> <20050706181220.3978d7f6.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:12:20 -0700 > ouch. What do we do? Default to off? Default to off on xmeta? Good question. Whatever security is gained by the va randomization stuff is definitely not worth a 0.23 --> 3.0 second performance regression.