From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262225AbVGFKJs (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:09:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262203AbVGFKGy (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:06:54 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:59863 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262234AbVGFIWy (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:22:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:22:30 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 Message-ID: <20050706082230.GF1412@elf.ucw.cz> References: <11206164393426@foobar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11206164393426@foobar.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > As requested, here are the patches that form Suspend2, for review. > > I've tried to split it up into byte size chunks, but please don't expect > that these will be patches that can mutate swsusp into Suspend2. That > would roughly equivalent to asking for patches that patch Reiser3 into > Reiser4 - it's a redesign. > > There are a few extra patches not included here, all of which are not > core to Suspend2. Since I'm not expecting this code to get merged as is, > I haven't worried about including them. If that's a problem, let me know. Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused. Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.