From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262445AbVGFS6w (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:58:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261921AbVGFSyq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:54:46 -0400 Received: from mail26.bluewin.ch ([195.186.19.68]:33523 "EHLO mail26.bluewin.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262025AbVGFNqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:46:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:43:49 +0200 From: Adrian Ulrich To: David Masover Cc: reiser@namesys.com, hubert@uhoreg.ca, agmsmith@rogers.com, ross.biro@gmail.com, vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, ltd@cisco.com, gmaxwell@gmail.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, zam@namesys.com, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, ndiller@namesys.com, vitaly@thebsh.namesys.com Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Message-Id: <20050706154349.5d6aa92c.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> In-Reply-To: <42CBD7F6.2050203@slaphack.com> References: <42CB1E12.2090005@namesys.com> <1740726161-BeMail@cr593174-a> <87hdf8zqca.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> <42CB7DE0.4050200@namesys.com> <42CBD7F6.2050203@slaphack.com> Organization: Bluewin AG X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > so all we have left is the issue of whether using /meta costs us > performance, or whether breaking POSIX to add a symlink (such as > foo/...) really gives us that much more usability. IMHO '/meta' isn't such a good idea, because a chrooted application won't be able to use it.