From: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
"Bouchard, Sebastien" <Sebastien.Bouchard@ca.kontron.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lorenzini,
Mario" <mario.lorenzini@ca.kontron.com>
Subject: Re: Patch of a new driver for kernel 2.4.x that need review
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:15:37 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050707081537.84373.qmail@web25804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi Willy,
> Willy Tarreau writes:
>
>> I dont agree with you here : enums are good to simply specify an ordering.
>> But they must not be used to specify static mapping. Eg: if REG4 *must* be
>> equal to BASE+4, you should not use enums, otherwise it will render the
>> code unreadable. I personnaly don't want to count the position of REG7 in
>> the enum to discover that it's at BASE+7.
>
>
> Sorry, what do you have to count with the following?
> enum {
> TLCLK_REG0 = TLCLK_BASE,
> TLCLK_REG1 = TLCLK_BASE+1,
> TLCLK_REG2 = TLCLK_BASE+2,
> };
> Please note that enums are a general way of specifying _constants_ with the
type int, not necessarily named enumerations.
BTW, a lot of drivers use define for register mapping in kernel. Since enum
is not a new C feature, I'm wondering why kernel have prefered using define
in the past...
thanks,
Francis
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-07 8:15 moreau francis [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-22 15:12 Bouchard, Sebastien
2005-06-22 19:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-22 20:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-22 20:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2005-06-22 21:58 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-06-23 4:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-23 4:16 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-23 4:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-07-06 21:11 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-07 6:00 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-07 6:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-07-07 6:55 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-07 7:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-07-07 7:43 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-07 6:10 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-22 20:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-23 21:42 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-22 21:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-06 21:14 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-06 22:49 ` randy_dunlap
2005-07-06 22:57 ` Greg KH
2005-08-08 15:35 ` Mark Gross
2005-08-09 7:17 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-08-09 16:56 ` Mark Gross
2005-08-09 17:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050707081537.84373.qmail@web25804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
--to=francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr \
--cc=Sebastien.Bouchard@ca.kontron.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.lorenzini@ca.kontron.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®