From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262152AbVGGTIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:08:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261951AbVGGTGA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:06:00 -0400 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:15786 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261946AbVGGTEa (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:04:30 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Jon Schindler" Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with dual core athlon 64 (quick question) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:04:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200507071129.38714.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507072104.26034.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday, 7 of July 2005 18:41, Jon Schindler wrote: > Hi Rafael, > I looked at the patch and noticed that it's changing a file inside > linux-2.6.12-rc6/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c > So, basically, it's modifying the powernow driver in the i386 arch > directory, but shouldn't that file be in "arch/x86_64/....", or am I missing > something? Yes. :-) > I'm compiling the kernel for x86_64, so will my 64 bit kernel > use this file even though it's in the i386 directory? Yes, it will. x86-64 uses some sources from i386 directly, including cpufreq (they would be identical anyway). Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"