From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262195AbVGLTAC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:00:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262186AbVGLS74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:59:56 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:34238 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262195AbVGLS6o (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:58:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050712.115835.42775885.davem@davemloft.net> To: kaber@trash.net Cc: dsd@gentoo.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12 netfilter: local packets marked as invalid From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <42D3B063.3000207@trash.net> References: <42CE8E96.1040905@trash.net> <42CEA5E4.40009@gentoo.org> <42D3B063.3000207@trash.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:58:27 +0200 > Daniel Drake wrote: > > You'll have to forgive my lack of netfilter knowledge, I set up my firewall > > ages ago and haven't really touched it since :) > > We decided to revert the responsible change because it caused problems > in other areas as well. This patch should fix your problem. Applied. Now the question is what to do about the 2.6.12.x stable tree. I think we put the offending change there, now we need to revert it there too. Patrick, could you push this patch to stable@kernel.org so we can resolve that too? Thanks a lot.