From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262613AbVGMNZd (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:25:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262638AbVGMNZd (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:25:33 -0400 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]:15261 "HELO smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262613AbVGMNZb (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:25:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=V8YH2CTSAPaPxTckxv9R+zSlrA50fHzdObFaM+u2fZZol5oKNK1u5r4veYTH7e/Q10/F4E3h0TG0B6S7ENfeMTeVpnTFngG6TTwSCx9esnnzbzgh6QMFSQ8dFZzTi0fahD/S/Boc18VcY3pK04rxjTM5ljZEonEeYGJlzbKsRtA= ; From: Blaisorblade To: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 1/1] uml: fix TT mode by reverting "use fork instead of clone" Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:33:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: stable@kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20050712172838.271E8D9A84@zion.home.lan> <20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <20050712185023.GY19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507131533.00817.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 12 July 2005 20:50, Chris Wright wrote: > * blaisorblade@yahoo.it (blaisorblade@yahoo.it) wrote: > > Revert the following patch, because of miscompilation problems in > > different environments leading to UML not working *at all* in TT mode; it > > was merged lately in 2.6 development cycle, a little after being written, > > and has caused problems to lots of people; I know it's a bit too long, > > but it shouldn't have been merged in first place, so I still apply for > > inclusion in the -stable tree. Anyone using this feature currently is > > either using some older kernel (some reports even used 2.6.12-rc4-mm2) or > > using this patch, as included in my -bs patchset. > > For now there's not yet a fix for this patch, so for now the best thing > > is to drop it (which was widely reported to give a working kernel). > And upstream will leave this in, working to real fix? Preferably yes, but this depends on whether the fix is found. Otherwise this exact patch will be merged upstream too. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it