From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261208AbVGMXos (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:44:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262341AbVGMXn6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:43:58 -0400 Received: from jurassic.park.msu.ru ([195.208.223.243]:17071 "EHLO jurassic.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262652AbVGMXk4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:40:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 03:40:19 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: John Rose Cc: lkml Subject: Re: pci_size() error condition Message-ID: <20050714034019.B25768@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <1121295192.23038.15.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1121295192.23038.15.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com>; from johnrose@austin.ibm.com on Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 05:53:13PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 05:53:13PM -0500, John Rose wrote: > Before a recent change, mask was a 64-bit number. The second part of > the if statement would always resolve to true, since the 32-bit bitop > would never equal the 64-bit mask. So the second part of the if > statement was ineffectual up until very recently. It was always effectual for IO where the mask is 0xffff. Ivan.