From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261639AbVGNRsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:48:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262641AbVGNRsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:48:02 -0400 Received: from [212.76.87.160] ([212.76.87.160]:8964 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261639AbVGNRsA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:48:00 -0400 Message-Id: <200507141742.UAA06527@raad.intranet> From: "Al Boldi" To: "'Arjan van de Ven'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" Cc: "'Vojtech Pavlik'" , "'Lee Revell'" , "'dean gaudet'" , "'Chris Wedgwood'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Brown, Len'" , , , , , , , , , Subject: RE: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:42:17 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <1121360561.3967.55.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Thread-Index: AcWIlxyHOEWTrWupRN6jc/yJPupHwwAA9dHQ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > There's absolutely nothing wrong with "jiffies", and anybody who > thinks that > > msleep(20); > > is fundamentally better than > > timeout = jiffies + HZ/50; > What's wrong with structured programming?