From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261682AbVGNSuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:50:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263082AbVGNSuG (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:50:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:914 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261682AbVGNSsX (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:48:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:48:21 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Li-Ta Lo Cc: yhlu , "Ronald G. Minnich" , Stefan Reinauer , discuss@x86-64.org, LinuxBIOS , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [LinuxBIOS] NUMA support for dual core Opteron Message-ID: <20050714184821.GJ23619@wotan.suse.de> References: <2ea3fae10507141058c476927@mail.gmail.com> <1121365786.3317.6.camel@logarithm.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1121365786.3317.6.camel@logarithm.lanl.gov> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > AFIAK, for x86_64 kernel, it will try to read NUMA configuration from > HW directory. We don't have to export any ACPI table. It doesn't work for dual core or 8 sockets for some reason. Since the SRAT code works fine and is in general more future proof we never tracked down why. Patches welcome. However you'll likely need ACPI for other reasons anyways, e.g. for better power saving. -Andi