From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261428AbVGOPG2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:06:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263315AbVGOPG2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:06:28 -0400 Received: from [212.76.86.54] ([212.76.86.54]:51204 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261428AbVGOPG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:06:27 -0400 Message-Id: <200507151505.SAA00652@raad.intranet> From: "Al Boldi" To: "'Chen, Kenneth W'" Cc: Subject: RE: [announce] linux kernel performance project launch at sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:05:33 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200507142021.j6EKLPg04710@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Thread-Index: AcWIsZvEsks0gLpjRFuu0RnyvLbzGgAeKOsQ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ken Chen wrote: { ...Linux kernel needs a systematic and disciplined way to measure and track kernel performance on a regular basis. } Nice, but the numbers would have more meaning if they were put in relation to System Load ( CPU,MEM,DISK,NET,... ) Also, a test that saturates resources would easily expose deeper Kernel problems. Thanks, Al