Re: Fix missing refrigerator invocation in jffs2.

["Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>]

On Mon, 18 July 2005 14:14:53 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> 
> Here's a patch to fix a missing refrigerator call in jffs2.
                                                           ^
You should shorten the description by one letter, roughly. ;)

> 
> Signed-off by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
> 
>  intrep.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> diff -ruNp 235-jffs-intrep.patch-old/fs/jffs/intrep.c 235-jffs-intrep.patch-new/fs/jffs/intrep.c
> --- 235-jffs-intrep.patch-old/fs/jffs/intrep.c	2005-07-18 06:36:59.000000000 +1000
> +++ 235-jffs-intrep.patch-new/fs/jffs/intrep.c	2005-07-18 14:02:27.000000000 +1000
> @@ -3397,6 +3397,9 @@ jffs_garbage_collect_thread(void *ptr)
>  			siginfo_t info;
>  			unsigned long signr = 0;
>  
> +			if (try_to_freeze())
> +				continue;
> +
>  			spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>  			signr = dequeue_signal(current, &current->blocked, &info);
>  			spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> 
> -- 
> Evolution.
> Enumerate the requirements.
> Consider the interdependencies.
> Calculate the probabilities.
> Be amazed that people believe it happened. 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Jörn

-- 
A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is
no battle unless there be two.
-- Seneca