From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261925AbVGSDSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:18:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261927AbVGSDSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:18:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.lnxw.com ([207.21.185.24]:7181 "EHLO smtp.lnxw.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261925AbVGSDSH (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:18:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:26:24 -0700 To: Esben Nielsen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Daniel Walker , Ingo Molnar , Dave Chinner , greg@kroah.com, Nathan Scott , Steve Lord , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: RT and XFS Message-ID: <20050719032624.GA22060@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <20050714160835.GA19229@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Bill Huey (hui) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:10:31PM +0200, Esben Nielsen wrote: > Unfortunately, one of the goals of the preempt-rt branch is to avoid > altering too much code. Therefore the type semaphore can't be removed > there. Therefore the name still lingers ... :-( This is where you failed. You assumed that that person making the comment, Christopher, in the first place didn't have his head up his ass in the first place and was open to your end of the discussion. bill