From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261500AbVGTUq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:46:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261503AbVGTUq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:46:28 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:9122 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261500AbVGTUqI (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:46:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:45:56 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com Cc: ak@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific) Message-ID: <20050720204556.GB8665@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com wrote: > Oh, sorry, we're talking about two different patches. I sent in a > different patch yesterday, because Andi Kleen didn't seem very > enthusiastic about fixnx2.patch. Here's the patch that I sent > yesterday (attached as file init.c.patch). ah - ok - this patch indeed should solve it. Ingo