From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262307AbVGWDFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262317AbVGWDFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:05:19 -0400 Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:5893 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262307AbVGWDFR (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:05:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20050722.230559.123762041.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: laforge@netfilter.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20050723125427.GA11177@rama> References: <20050723125427.GA11177@rama> Organization: USAGI/WIDE Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20050723125427.GA11177@rama> (at Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:54:27 -0400), Harald Welte says: > --- a/include/linux/netlink.h > +++ b/include/linux/netlink.h > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > #define NETLINK_IP6_FW 13 > #define NETLINK_DNRTMSG 14 /* DECnet routing messages */ > #define NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT 15 /* Kernel messages to userspace */ > -#define NETLINK_TAPBASE 16 /* 16 to 31 are ethertap */ > +#define NETLINK_W1 16 /* 16 to 31 are ethertap */ > > #define MAX_LINKS 32 > Comment says that 16-31 are used for ethertap. So, probably assigh NETLINK_W1 at 32, and bump MAX_LINKS? --yoshfuji