From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc3a] i386: inline restore_fpu
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:27:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050722132756.578acca7.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507212309_MC3-1-A534-95EF@compuserve.com>
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
>
> This patch makes restore_fpu() an inline. When L1/L2 cache are saturated
> it makes a measurable difference.
>
> Results from profiling Volanomark follow. Sample rate was 2000 samples/sec
> (HZ = 250, profile multiplier = 8) on a dual-processor Pentium II Xeon.
>
>
> Before:
>
> 10680 restore_fpu 333.7500
> 8351 device_not_available 203.6829
> 3823 math_state_restore 59.7344
> -----
> 22854
>
>
> After:
>
> 12534 math_state_restore 130.5625
> 8354 device_not_available 203.7561
> -----
> 20888
>
>
> Patch is "obviously correct" and cuts 9% of the overhead. Please apply.
hm. What context switch rate is that thing doing?
Is the benchmark actually doing floating point stuff?
We do have the `used_math' optimisation in there which attempts to avoid
doing the FP save/restore if the app isn't actually using math. But
<ancient recollections> there's code in glibc startup which always does a
bit of float, so that optimisation is always defeated. There was some
discussion about periodically setting tasks back into !used_math state to
try to restore the optimisation for tasks which only do a little bit of FP,
but nothing actually got done.
> Next step should be to physically place math_state_restore() after
> device_not_available(). Would such a patch be accepted? (Yes it
> would be ugly and require linker script changes.)
Depends on the benefit/ugly ratio ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-22 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-22 3:06 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-22 3:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-07-22 5:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-22 11:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-07-22 8:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-22 18:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-25 19:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-22 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-22 9:58 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23 7:09 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 17:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-07-23 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 7:09 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] <200507212309_MC3-1-A534-95EF@compuserve.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20050722132756.578acca7.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-23 15:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-24 12:56 Kenneth Parrish
2005-07-25 2:34 Kenneth Parrish
2005-07-26 21:23 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-26 21:23 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-26 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-27 1:40 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050722132756.578acca7.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®