From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261502AbVGYU2G (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:28:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261282AbVGYU2G (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:28:06 -0400 Received: from [194.90.237.34] ([194.90.237.34]:12375 "EHLO mtlex01.yok.mtl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261502AbVGYU1J (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:27:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:32:00 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: gregkh@suse.de, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mj@ucw.cz Cc: openib-general@openib.org Subject: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range Message-ID: <20050725223200.GA1545@mellanox.co.il> Reply-To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg, Martin, does the following make sense? If it does, should other architectures be updated as well? --- Convert i386/pci to use io_remap_pfn_range instead of remap_pfn_range. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Index: linux-2.6.12.2/arch/i386/pci/i386.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.12.2.orig/arch/i386/pci/i386.c +++ linux-2.6.12.2/arch/i386/pci/i386.c @@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev * /* Write-combine setting is ignored, it is changed via the mtrr * interfaces on this platform. */ - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_pgoff, - vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, - vma->vm_page_prot)) + if (io_remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_pgoff, + vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, + vma->vm_page_prot)) return -EAGAIN; return 0; -- MST