From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262132AbVG0S7W (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:59:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262454AbVG0S6L (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:58:11 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46233 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262486AbVG0Swx (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:52:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:52:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] safty check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO Message-ID: <20050727185234.GA1699@elte.hu> References: <1122473595.29823.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050727141754.GA25356@elte.hu> <1122474396.29823.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050727143318.GA26303@elte.hu> <1122475620.29823.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1122475620.29823.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We > > should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to > > not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled > > with. > > So Ingo, would you agree that at least this patch should go in? yeah. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Ingo