From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261901AbVG1XOx (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:14:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261935AbVG1XOx (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:14:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:1218 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261901AbVG1XOw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:14:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:13:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: george@mvista.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NMI watch dog notify patch Message-Id: <20050728161341.15bf9625.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <42E940BE.3020908@mvista.com> References: <42E940BE.3020908@mvista.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org George Anzinger wrote: > > This patch adds a notify to the nmi watchdog to notify that > the system is about to be taken down by the watchdog. If the > notify is handled with a NOTIFY_STOP return, the system is > given a new lease on life. It looks sensible, but as there aren't actually any in-kernel uses for this I'd have thought it would be better for it to live out-of-tree?