From: Doug Reiland <d_reiland@yahoo.com>
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: RFC: 64-bit resources and changes to pci, ioremap, ...
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050729204845.84212.qmail@web31704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D72313E7-E2EC-4066-AD2A-02DAFE66B7E6@freescale.com>
current pentium4 have this problem as well. Shouldn't
need to use the emt64 (x86_64) mode. It takes i/o
bridges and MCH to support it, but the latest Intel
ones do. However, I am pretty sure BIOSes wouldn't
assign the pci/pci-e addresses > 4GIG so most are not
impacted.
--- Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com> wrote:
> As I started to update the existing patches to make
> struct resource
> have 64-bit start and end values I started to see
> all the places that
> this effects and was hoping to get some discussion
> on what direction
> we want to take.
>
> One of the main reasons to make this change is to
> handle processors
> that have larger physical address space than
> effective. A number of
> higher-end embedded processors are starting to
> support larger
> physical address space while still having a 32-bit
> effective
> address. I was wondering if any x86 variants
> support this type of
> feature?
>
> The main issue that I'm starting to see is that the
> concept of a
> physical address from the processors point of view
> needs to be
> consistent throughout all subsystems of the kernel.
> Currently the
> major usage of struct resource is with the PCI
> subsystem and PCI
> drivers. The following are some questions that I
> was hoping to get
> answers to and discussion around:
>
> * How many 32-bit systems support larger than 32-bit
> physical
> addresses (I know newer PPCs do)?
> * How many 32-bit systems support a 64-bit PCI
> address space?
> * Should ioremap and variants start taking 64-bit
> physical addresses?
> * Do we make this an arch option and wrap start and
> end in a typedef
> similar to pte_t and provide accessor macros to
> ensure proper use?
>
> Andrew has also asked me to post size comparisons of
> drivers/*/*.o
> building allmodconfig with 32-bit resources and
> 64-bit resources to
> see what the size growth is. I'll post logs for
> people to take a
> look at in a followup email.
>
> - Kumar
>
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-29 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-29 15:53 Kumar Gala
2005-07-29 17:02 ` Deepak Saxena
2005-07-29 20:48 ` Doug Reiland [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050729204845.84212.qmail@web31704.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=d_reiland@yahoo.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®