From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262883AbVG2VdP (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:33:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262908AbVG2V15 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:27:57 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:20634 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262878AbVG2V0p (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:26:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:22:22 +0200 From: bert hubert To: Xin Zhao Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why dump_stack results different so much? Message-ID: <20050729212221.GA32570@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Xin Zhao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4ae3c140507291327143a9d83@mail.gmail.com> <20050729203403.GA30603@outpost.ds9a.nl> <4ae3c140507291400230ca65c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ae3c140507291400230ca65c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:00:20PM -0400, Xin Zhao wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Below is the code that print the kernel calling trace: Can I suggest just turning on frame pointers like I suggested? If you say Y here the resulting kernel image will be slightly larger and slower, but it will give very useful debugging information. If you don't debug the kernel, you can say N, but we may not be able to solve problems without frame pointers. Good luck! -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services