From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263078AbVG3Rkg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:40:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263087AbVG3Rkg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:40:36 -0400 Received: from 66-189-87-63.static.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([66.189.87.63]:45582 "EHLO lakshmi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263078AbVG3Rka (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:40:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:02:18 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables Message-ID: <20050730160218.GB4585@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20050728185655.9C6ADA3@zion.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050728185655.9C6ADA3@zion.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:56:53PM +0200, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote: > As obvious, a "core code nice cleanup" is not a "stability-friendly patch" so > usual care applies. These look reasonable, as they are what we discussed in Ottawa. I'll put them in my tree and see if I see any problems. I would suggest sending these in early after 2.6.13 if they seem OK. Jeff