From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263160AbVG3ULi (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:11:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263156AbVG3UJX (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:09:23 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:54732 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263150AbVG3UHA (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:07:00 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:06:53 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dominik Brodowski , mochel@digitalimplant.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dpm_runtime_suspend and _resume() Message-ID: <20050730200653.GC9188@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050730142502.GA4065@isilmar.linta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050730142502.GA4065@isilmar.linta.de> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > dpm_runtime_suspend and _resume() would be quite useful for some PCMCIA > tasks. However, they are only exported in drivers/base/power/power.h. Any > objection to moving it to include/linux/pm.h ? Any plans to break the > functionality these functions provide? Well, given that runtime suspend functions are parts of unfinished runtime-suspend infrastructure... what do you want to use them for? Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address