From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261748AbVGaNaI (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:30:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261749AbVGaNaI (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:30:08 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:3243 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261748AbVGaNaG (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:30:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:29:58 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Dominik Brodowski , Daniel Ritz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown Subject: Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend Message-ID: <20050731132958.GB14550@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Please revert the yenta free_irq on suspend patch (below) > > which went into 2.6.13-rc4 after 2.6.13-rc3-git9. > > Ok. Will do. > And the ACPI people had better stop doing this crazy thing in the first > place. There's really no point at all to freeing and re-requesting the > interrupts, and the IRQ controller should just re-initialize itself > instead. Well, on some machines interrupts can change during suspend (or so I was told). I did not like the ACPI change at one point, but it is very wrong to revert PCMCIA fix without also fixing ACPI interpretter. And it indeed seems that ACPI interpretter is hard to fix in the right way. Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address