From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261908AbVGaVVk (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261912AbVGaVVk (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:40 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:32897 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261908AbVGaVVh (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:21:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:20:58 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: ambx1@neo.rr.com Cc: Linus Torvalds , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Dominik Brodowski , Daniel Ritz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown Subject: Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend Message-ID: <20050731212058.GC27433@elf.ucw.cz> References: <2e00842e116e.2e116e2e0084@columbus.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e00842e116e.2e116e2e0084@columbus.rr.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Also I'd like to point out that this patch broke APM suspend-to-ram, > not ACPI S3. IMO, it may not be possible to support both APM and ACPI > on every system, as their specs are not intended to be compatible. > Progress toward proper suspend-to-ram support will, in many cases, be > a small setback for APM. This really can't be avoided. Actually, for APM, OS theoretically does *not* need to FREEZE the devices (or do anything else). "Doing nothing" should be easy... Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address