From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261198AbVHATzM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:55:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261206AbVHATy7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:54:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:13983 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261198AbVHATxp (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:53:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:54:26 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: mort@sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch] remove sys_set_zone_reclaim() Message-ID: <20050801195426.GA17548@elte.hu> References: <20050801113913.GA7000@elte.hu> <20050801102903.378da54f.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050801102903.378da54f.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton wrote: > > We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack, > > That would be more appropriate. > > (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to > "clear out this node+zone's pagecache now" rather than "set this > noed+zone's policy") lets do that as a sysctl hack. It would be useful for debugging purposes anyway. But i'm not sure whether it's the same issue - Martin? Ingo