mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Real-Time Preemption V0.7.52-07: rt_init_MUTEX_LOCKED declaration
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:50:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050801205006.GA20541@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42EE4D27.8060500@gmail.com>


* Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@gmail.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes broken rt_init_MUTEX_LOCKED declaration using 
> rt_sema_init() macro. This way we fix a potential compile bug: 
> rt_init_MUTEX_LOCKED calls 
> there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores, which is not 
> referenced. (e.g. drivers/char/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c: "cpu5wdt: Unknown 
> symbol there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores")

the right solution would be to mark policy->lock as a compat_semaphore.  
That will revert things back to the stock semantics. (at the price of 
not having PI, which isnt a big issue in this case.)

> -+extern void there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores(void);

the reason for not allowing init_MUTEX_LOCKED() is that in basically 
every case that does it, the semaphore is not used as a true mutex in 
the strict sense. So the affected semaphore should be changed to 
compat_semaphore, to gain full semantics.

	Ingo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-01 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-01 16:26 Luca Falavigna
2005-08-01 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 19:05   ` Luca Falavigna
2005-08-01 19:13     ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-08-01 19:26       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:24     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050801205006.GA20541@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dktrkranz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®