From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>
Subject: Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:54:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508012354.58105.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508012117431.6027@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
On Monday, 1 of August 2005 22:34, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 31 of July 2005 01:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus has apparently dropped that patch for yenta, but in case it is
> > > reintroduced in the future you will probably need a patch to make the network
> > > driver cooperate. I'll try to prepare one tomorrow, if I can, but I have no hardware
> > > to test it.
> >
> > The patch follows. It compiles and should work, though I haven't tested it.
>
> Thanks for making the effort, Rafael,
> but I'm afraid your patch does not solve it.
>
> Prior to -rc4, or in current -git which has the yenta patch reverted,
> my laptop manages APM resume from RAM with the following 8 messages
> (I won't complain that it could list even more permutations!)
>
> PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:00:1f.1
> PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:00.0
> PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:00.0
> PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:1f.1
> PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:01.0
> PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:01.1
> PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:01.1
> PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:01.0
>
> Unpatched -rc4 locks up on resume, showing none of those messages.
> -rc4 with your drivers/net/3c59x.c patch locks up on resume,
> after showing just the first four of those messages.
Thanks for testing. The results you observe mean that the problem is
in fact more complicated than I thought. It seems to make up a good
test case but I wouldn't like to bother you any more. :-)
> Whatever, I very much share the position Linus has expressed so
> forcefully: it's foolish suddenly to demand changes in an indeterminate
> number of drivers (surely yenta and 3c59x aren't the end of it?),
> especially in the final days leading up to a release.
Fully agreed.
> I surely would not have asked him to revert the yenta patch, nor would
> he have done so (thank you, Linus), if my machine were the only problem.
> It's very easy for me to carry my own patches to get working, but we
> fear the trouble seen here gives a foretaste of others' trouble if
> the changes were to remain in the release.
Indeed.
Greets,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-30 19:10 Hugh Dickins
2005-07-30 20:03 ` Russell King
2005-07-30 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-30 20:54 ` Russell King
2005-07-30 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-30 21:30 ` Russell King
2005-07-30 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-31 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 9:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-07-30 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-30 20:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-30 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-30 21:08 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-07-30 21:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-07-30 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-30 22:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-07-30 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-31 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-08-01 20:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2005-07-31 5:03 Brown, Len
2005-07-31 5:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-31 22:27 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-01 0:00 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-08-01 0:06 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-01 0:09 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-08-03 9:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 8:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-07-31 20:34 ambx1
2005-07-31 21:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 8:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-07-31 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 23:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 23:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31 23:59 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-01 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 0:44 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-01 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 7:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 7:01 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2005-08-01 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:10 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-01 1:59 ` Shaohua Li
2005-08-01 2:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-01 2:22 ` Shaohua Li
2005-08-01 7:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-08-01 3:03 ambx1
2005-08-01 4:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 8:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-02 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-03 11:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508012354.58105.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome