From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261359AbVHBKpk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 06:45:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261479AbVHBKpk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 06:45:40 -0400 Received: from grendel.sisk.pl ([217.67.200.140]:17309 "HELO mail.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261359AbVHBKpd (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 06:45:33 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jan De Luyck Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc5 - possible acpi regression? Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:50:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200508020843.08030.lkml@kcore.org> In-Reply-To: <200508020843.08030.lkml@kcore.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508021250.39136.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 2 of August 2005 08:43, Jan De Luyck wrote: > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:07, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, one more in the series towards final 2.6.13. > > One thing that seems like a regression: doing > > $ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/info > > causes a two-second pause and then gives me the information, while in 2.6.12.3 > that was near-instant. Please try to ad the ec_polling parameter to the kernel command line and retest. Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"