From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261726AbVHBTbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:31:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261735AbVHBTbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:31:13 -0400 Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk ([213.162.97.75]:53479 "EHLO mail.metronet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261726AbVHBTbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:31:12 -0400 From: Alistair John Strachan To: Lukas Hejtmanek Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc5 - ACPI regression Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:31:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Alessandro Suardi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050802175336.GA2959@mail.muni.cz> <5a4c581d05080211595cc07fa3@mail.gmail.com> <20050802190526.GB2959@mail.muni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050802190526.GB2959@mail.muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508022031.10613.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 02 Aug 2005 20:05, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: [snip] > > I did not notice before, but my values (capacity and so on) are completely > wrong. It should contain values in mWh instead of mAh. mWh is mAh x operational voltage. They're not "completely wrong", probably just whatever unit your machine's ACPI uses. The units are not the problem, it sounds like some other ACPI bug. -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.