From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262067AbVHCGGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 02:06:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262070AbVHCGGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 02:06:52 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:25806 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262067AbVHCGGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 02:06:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 08:06:40 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Andrew Burgess , LKML , Linux and Kernel Video Subject: Re: BTTV - experimental no_overlay patch Message-ID: <20050803060640.GC1399@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1123040424.5607.46.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1123040424.5607.46.camel@localhost> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > This small patch will allow no_overlay flag to disable BTTV driver to > report OVERLAY capabilities. It should fix your troubles by enabling > no_overlay=1 when inserting bttv module. > > This patch is against our CVS tree, but should apply with some hunk on > 2.6.13-rc4 or 2.6.13-rc5. > > I'll generate a new one at morning, against 2.6.13-rc5 hopefully to > have it applied at 2.6.13, since it fixes an OOPS. You have to pass option for it not to oops? That does not seem right.... Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.