From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262671AbVHDU7U (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:59:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262686AbVHDU5g (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:57:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:46729 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262679AbVHDU5B (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:57:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:58:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, zilvinas@gemtek.lt, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove suspend() calls from shutdown path Message-Id: <20050804135833.07a6702f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200508042251.14740.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1123148187.30257.55.camel@gaston> <20050804121604.GA4659@gemtek.lt> <1123168844.30257.64.camel@gaston> <200508042251.14740.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > On Thursday, 4 of August 2005 17:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:16 +0300, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote: > > > Hello Ben, Andrew, > > > > > > This patch helps me if I disconnect all USB peripherals before shutting > > > down notebook. With connected peripherals (USB mouse, PL2303 > > > USB<->serial converter/port) - powering off process stops right after > > > unmounting filesystems but before hda power off ... > > > > > > There is a bug report for this too: > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4992 > > > > This is unclear. > > > > I would expect the behaviour you report to happen _without_ this patch, > > that is with current git tree, and I would expect this patch to fix it > > by reverting to the previous 2.6.12 behaviour... > > I had this problem on a dual-core Athlon-based machine, but the patch > apparently fixed it. > So are all the (three?) bugs (regressions) which you were reporting now fixed?