From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262519AbVHDOxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262572AbVHDOvP (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:51:15 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:54721 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262519AbVHDOtA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:49:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:49:33 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, shemminger@osdl.org, rusty@au1.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT sane patch Message-ID: <20050804144933.GB1297@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com References: <20050801171137.GA1754@us.ibm.com> <20050804141527.GA15447@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050804141527.GA15447@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > The attached patch passes 20 hours of the internal-to-RCU torture test > > (see the code in the attached patch under CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST), > > which is a good improvement over last week's version, which would fail > > this test in less than two seconds -- this despite passing kernbench > > with flying colors and passing LTP 90% of the time. Sometimes there > > is no substitute for a good in-kernel stress test... > > > > The attached version of the patch seems to me to be ready for a larger > > audience. > > Cool! I've merged your patch to the -52-12 version of the -RT patch. You > can get it from the usual place: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ > > also, i've attached a port against 2.6.13-rc4. I have done this because > the PREEMPT_RCU patch in my tree is applied before the core-PREEMPT_RT > patch. I have fixed up the CONFIG_PREEMPT compilation branch and have > removed your #error define - it built and booted fine on an UP box but > there are no guarantees ... Sounds great!!! I will give it a thorough hammering in both the CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT environments. Thanx, Paul