From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262712AbVHDV2o (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:28:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262714AbVHDV0X (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:26:23 -0400 Received: from grendel.sisk.pl ([217.67.200.140]:33416 "HELO mail.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262709AbVHDVYt (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:24:49 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove suspend() calls from shutdown path Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:30:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1123148187.30257.55.camel@gaston> <200508042251.14740.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050804135833.07a6702f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050804135833.07a6702f.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508042330.02817.rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, zilvinas@gemtek.lt, torvalds@osdl.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 4 of August 2005 22:58, you wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 4 of August 2005 17:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 15:16 +0300, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote: > > > > Hello Ben, Andrew, > > > > > > > > This patch helps me if I disconnect all USB peripherals before shutting > > > > down notebook. With connected peripherals (USB mouse, PL2303 > > > > USB<->serial converter/port) - powering off process stops right after > > > > unmounting filesystems but before hda power off ... > > > > > > > > There is a bug report for this too: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4992 > > > > > > This is unclear. > > > > > > I would expect the behaviour you report to happen _without_ this patch, > > > that is with current git tree, and I would expect this patch to fix it > > > by reverting to the previous 2.6.12 behaviour... > > > > I had this problem on a dual-core Athlon-based machine, but the patch > > apparently fixed it. > > > > So are all the (three?) bugs (regressions) which you were reporting now > fixed? Yes. As far as 2.6.13-rc5 (with the Ben's patch) is concerned, I have no visible problems whatever on any of my boxes. Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"