From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262914AbVHEIEu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 04:04:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262907AbVHEICL (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 04:02:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:60857 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262897AbVHEIAz (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 04:00:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:59:32 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Richard Purdie Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jamey@handhelds.org, anpaza@mail.ru, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: platform-device-driver-for-mq11xx-graphics-chip.patch added to -mm tree Message-Id: <20050805005932.73721447.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1123228133.7649.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200508050719.j757J9KO032652@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1123228133.7649.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 00:18 -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > The patch titled > > > > platform-device driver for MQ11xx graphics chip > > > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > > > platform-device-driver-for-mq11xx-graphics-chip.patch > > > > drivers/platform/.tmp_versions/mq11xx_base.mod | 2 > > I doubt that should be there... Zap. > > drivers/platform/Kconfig | 23 > > drivers/platform/Makefile | 5 > > drivers/platform/mq11xx.h | 925 ++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/platform/mq11xx_base.c | 1390 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > I'm also still wondering if drivers/mfd would be better in the long term > for code like this (as mentioned in various threads on LKML). That way > it is doesn't have to be platform device specific... That's what Russell thinks.